Max
Perkins' Death and the Decline of Hemingway
By
Kelley Dupuis
On
July 21, 1940, Ernest Hemingway turned 41 years old. He was
just finishing For Whom the Bell Tolls, which was published
to great acclaim a few months later. In fact by the time Max
Perkins, who was both Hemingway's and Scott Fitzgerald's editor
at Scribner's, had returned from Fitzgerald's funeral late
that year, For Whom the Bell Tolls had already sold
189,000 copies. Three days after the book was published, a
deal for nearly $150,000 was signed with Paramount for the
film rights. The film was duly made in 1943, with Gary Cooper
in the role of Robert Jordan and Ingrid Bergman, just a year
off her appearance opposite Humphrey Bogart in Casablanca,
as Maria.
In
terms of his success as a writer, 1940 was in some ways the
apotheosis of Ernest Hemingway. Critics and the reading public,
who had been tracking and for the most part admiring his work
since the publication of his first novel, The Sun Also
Rises, in 1926, felt they had every reason to expect only
further triumphs from the man who had become by then the most
famous, and in the eyes of many, the greatest living American
writer.
It
didn't happen. In fact, in many ways and for a stew of reasons
mixing everything from married life to geopolitics, the decade
of the 1940s became Hemingway's version of the Lost Weekend.
Though busy with a number of projects which included not only
covering the war in Europe as a journalist, but also work
on a massive, unfinished novel to be called The Garden
of Eden (published in a heavily-edited edition in 1986)
Hemingway produced no significant work of fiction between
1940 and 1950, and when he finally did, he might well have
wished he hadn't.
As
the decade began he was living in Cuba with his third wife,
celebrated journalist Martha Gellhorn. However, not content
to stay home in Cuba and be Mrs. Ernest Hemingway with a war
raging in Europe, Gellhorn went off to cover the war as a
correspondent for Colliers magazine, and Hemingway
somewhat-reluctantly followed suit after a Huck Finn-like
stint of hunting for German submarines in the Gulf Stream
aboard his fishing boat, the Pilar. Hemingway had been
an ambulance driver in World War I and a news correspondent
in the Spanish Civil War. World War II would be the third
and last war he would witness (and once again, ironically,
Hemingway, who was so fascinated with war and all of its trappings,
would participate only as a non-combatant.)
Hemingway's
marriage to Gellhorn became one of the war's casualties. By
the spring of 1946 he was married to his fourth and final
wife, journalist Mary Welsh.
With
the war over, Hemingway went back to Cuba and resumed the
life of writing, boozing and marlin-fishing that it had interrupted.
Without a doubt he felt that he had earned the right to "kick
back" and enjoy himself for while after working hard in Europe
as a war correspondent, and certainly he returned to Cuba
more famous than ever. That was part of the problem. From
the late '40s onward, Hemingway and the media "worked" each
other increasingly, and energies that he should have devoted
to writing were devoted instead to "playing the role of Ernest
Hemingway" for a cavalcade of reporters and photographers.
Two
separate, highly significant and not necessarily unrelated
catastrophes struck Hemingway in the years immediately following
World War II. The first was the death in 1947 of his beloved
and trusted editor Max Perkins, and the second, three years
later, was the publication of his first full-length novel
since For Whom The Bell Tolls, the disastrous Across
The River And Into The Trees.
Perkins
had been Hemingway's editor since 1929, when he had worked
with Hemingway on A Farewell to Arms. Hemingway's father
had committed suicide not long before Hemingway first met
Perkins, and from the earliest days of their association,
Perkins took on something of a fatherly role with Hemingway,
much the same role he assumed about the same time for an ungainly
young man from North Carolina named Thomas Wolfe, who had
recently dumped an avalanche of manuscript on Perkins' desk
which Perkins would eventually hew and carve into Look
Homeward, Angel.
Over
the nearly 20 years of their association, Perkins acquired
the reputation of being the editor at Scribner's best qualified
to handle the man who was well known as the touchiest author
in the firm's stable. Perkins knew how to deal diplomatically
with the vain, moody and mercurial Hemingway, could guage
when it was "safe" to offer him honest criticisms of his work
and when it was a better idea to soft-pedal. It was with Perkins'
editorial "ruddering" that Hemingway brought out all of his
fiction from A Farewell to Arms to For Whom the
Bell Tolls, a decade which also included Death in the
Afternoon, Green Hills of Africa, To Have and Have
Not, the short-story collections Men Without Women and Winner Take Nothing and a play about the Spanish
Civil War, The Fifth Column.
The
'30s had been a busy and productive time for both men. But
when Perkins died, Hemingway had not published a novel in
seven years.
For
many who pursue it, writing is very much like playing a musical
instrument. You have to stay in practice or you get rusty.
Hemingway loved to apply sports metaphors to writing-his remarks
about having "outboxed" de Maupassant, Stendhal and Turgenev
have been repeated ad nauseam-and indeed he seemed to have
been one of those writers who needs to stay "in training"
to keep his writing sharp, not surprising perhaps in view
of the heavy emphasis Hemingway's writing always did put on
pure sensory experience-seeing, smelling, tasting, touching
and hearing. (Although he drank a lot throughout his life,
Hemingway never smoked again after his early twenties-he didn't
like the way it dulled his sense of smell.)
With
all of this in mind, Perkins' death couldn't have come at
a worse time for Hemingway. He was physically out of shape,
overweight and soaked in liquor, (though he did often cut
back on his drinking for one reason or another) and his body,
including his head, was battered and tired from a long history
of injuries and accidents. Journalism had taken up a lot of
his time during the war years, and despite continued work
on such projects as the ultimately-tabled Garden of Eden,
Hemingway hadn't publicly strutted his stuff in a long time.
It
was in this atmosphere that Hemingway decided to make his
"comeback." Perkins was gone, and between being both out-of-shape
and increasingly worried that after all these years he might
not be able to perform like he used to, (and hence disappoint
a world that, even without People magazine or eight-second
sound bites, had turned him into a superstar) Hemingway was
in no condition to be his own best editor. And so, as Hemingway
worked away on a new tale, set in Venice, through a haze of
booze shot through with the piercing stage lights of global
adulation, he managed to persuade himself that he was writing
a masterpiece, his best book yet. And there was no Max Perkins
around any more to gently rein him in and persuade him to
cut here, condense there.
The
result was an unqualified disaster. A hopeless romantic despite
his tough-guy posturing, Hemingway throughout his life was
constantly falling in and out of love with one woman after
another. He married four of them, but there were plenty of
other "infatuations" along the way, and the older he got,
the younger they got. In the late 1940s, the overweight, booze-bloated,
celebrity-inflated Hemingway, pushing 50, became infatuated
with a beautiful young Italian woman, Adriana Ivancich. The
character Renata in Across the River and Into the Trees is based on her, and Renata's doomed love affair in Venice
with a dying American army colonel, Richard Cantwell, plays
out Hemingway's fantasy about himself and Adriana in much
the same way that, 20 years earlier, the fate of Frederic
Henry and Catherine Barkley in A Farewell to Arms had played
out his wishful embroidering upon his disappointing relationship
with 26 year-old hospital nurse Agnes von Kurowski after the
then 19 year-old Hemingway had been wounded on the Italian
front in 1918.
It
is not my purpose here to write a review of a book that was
published 50 years ago, but let me just mention the point
at which Across the River and Into the Trees starts
to "go wrong" for me.
The
book starts out well enough. The duck-shooting scene in Ch.
1 has all of the old Hemingway magic. You hear that ice crack.
You see those boats moving in the canal. Cantwell is thirsty;
you're thirsty.
It's
at the beginning of Ch. 2 that I detect the first warning
signs of Ernest Miller Hemingway fading into the wings and
the huffing and puffing "Papa" taking center stage. Twice
on the same page he refers to Cantwell not as an "army colonel"
or a "colonel in the army" as anyone else might, but as a
"Colonel of Infantry in the Army of the United States." This
is affectation, and the older Hemingway got, the more he swam
in it. And from that point in the book, things just get windily
worse.
In
his controversial 1986 "psychobiography" of Hemingway, Kenneth
Lynn raised the enticing question (buttressed by like-minded
speculation from Canadian critic Northrop Frye) that had Perkins
not died when he did, he might have tried to talk Hemingway
into distilling this material into a short story. Frye pointed
out, and Lynn agrees, that there is much good in the story,
and had Hemingway boiled it down to say, 100 pages, it might
have been his version of Death in Venice, with all
the lyricism and power of Thomas Mann's 1911 mini-masterpiece.
One
can speculate forever on such "fantasy baseball" issues, but
the fact is that Hemingway's self-critical judgment had not
deserted him entirely despite his catastrophic "bad call"
on Across the River. Had Perkins still been around,
it might indeed have been a better book. Surely Hemingway's
ability to cut, compress and keep it short, always one of
his strengths, was still there. Having been knocked to the
mat (to use a metaphor he would have liked) by the critics
over Across the River, he got back to his feet and
two years later issued the short work that would clinch the
Nobel Prize for him. Despite what you might think of The
Old Man and the Sea, (and I have little use for its gooey
sentimentality myself) it showed that Hemingway could still
control his material if he wanted to. He would lose that ability
within a few years as his physical and mental problems mounted.
But it is tantalizing to wonder about what the quality of
the work of Hemingway's final years might have looked like
had not his good friend and most trusted editor died when
Hemingway, to judge from what he subsequently produced, was
just about to need him the most.
Kelley
Dupuis. April 2000
MORE
GREAT WORK FROM KELLEY. Kelley Dupuis is one of the
most informative people on Hemingway we have ever come across.
He can help students with their studies on Hemingway,
but please respect his immense literary insight and knowledge
and do not ask him to do your homework. Your understanding
of Hemingway comes from your own personal research. Kelley
Dupuis can help with his literary insight of Hemingway but
his help is for serious students of Hemingway. Thanks. kelley@kelleydupuis.com
General
enquiries to ernest@hemingway.com